Blumaverick
BLUMAVERICK
No. 01  /  Reflection Tool
Authority Beyond Title™
BluShift™ Early Access Companion

The Authority
Gap Checklist

Finally, no more guessing. See where you are inside the structural authority gap — and where AI is compounding it. BluShift™ reveals what closes it.

How to use this checklist

For each statement, check the box that fits: Yes, Some, or No.

Two parts of the overall authority gap. Part A — Foundational (8 questions). Part B — AI (10 questions).

This is the interactive companion. Click any box to mark it. Your "Yes" totals appear in the running tally for each Part, and your Authority Gap Profile surfaces in the scoring section once all 18 items are complete.

Part A · Foundational
0/8
Part B · AI
0/10
Part A · Foundational Dimensions

The structural dimensions independent of AI.

Eight statements about where scope, responsibility, and impact exceed your formal authority.

  1. 01
    My scope exceeds my formal authority.
  2. 02
    My contribution is larger than the credit I receive.
  3. 03
    My role has expanded beyond its original design.
  4. 04
    I own decisions that belong two levels up.
  5. 05
    My strategic value is not fully visible to senior leadership.
  6. 06
    I operate in a high-accountability persona not reflected in my title.
  7. 07
    My current performance supports a broader mandate.
  8. 08
    I'm expected to deliver results where authority is shared or ambiguous.
Part B · AI Dimensions

The dimensions AI has compounded.

Ten statements about the authority to govern AI outcomes you're now held accountable for.

  1. 09
    I'm accountable for AI outcomes, but my formal mandate wasn't extended to cover them.
  2. 10
    Decision rights around AI systems are unclear — multiple people influence, no one decides.
  3. 11
    I'm expected to override AI recommendations, but lack formal authority.
  4. 12
    When AI fails, escalation paths are undefined — decisions become political.
  5. 13
    My structural authority to govern AI isn't formally recognized — I rely on relationships.
  6. 14
    Business units deploy AI without involving me, yet I'm held accountable for governance.
  7. 15
    I own the risk and liability when AI fails, but wasn't involved in design or deployment.
  8. 16
    The board expects me to govern AI risk, but I lack authority over teams deploying AI.
  9. 17
    I'm responsible for AI governance but lack budget, team, or authority to enforce standards.
  10. 18
    It's unclear who has authority to pause AI deployments or keep humans in the loop.
Scoring Guide

Read your structural position.

Part A · Foundational Dimensions
5–8
Yes
Clear gap in the foundational dimensions. Scope is operating well ahead of the structure recognizing it.
3–4
Yes
Moderate misalignment. Specific foundational dimensions are out of sync.
0–2
Yes
Foundational dimensions relatively aligned. Architecture mostly matches your scope today.
Part B · AI Dimensions
8–10
Yes
Critical exposure in the AI dimensions. AI moved fast, your structure didn't move at all.
5–7
Yes
Significant exposure. Authority over AI is partially recognized, partially absent.
2–4
Yes
Emerging exposure. Specific AI dimensions are starting to surface.
0–1
Yes
Minimal exposure. AI accountability and authority are aligned, or AI isn't in your scope yet.
Your Authority Gap Profile appears here
0 of 18 answered
Contact

Questions worth asking before BluShift™.

If any of these are circling, send a note. Replies come from Patricia, not a queue.

Is this coaching?
No. Blumaverick is private 1:1 advisory. It diagnoses the structural gap and designs the architecture to close it.
When does BluShift™ open?
You have Early Access. The diagnostic is rolling out to qualified executives in cohorts. Expect a note when your slot is ready.
Can I share this with my team?
Yes — forward freely. If a peer wants the assessment, BluShift™ Early Access is open at blumaverick.io/blushift.
Direct line
hello@blumaverick.io